Essay Sample America had every right, mind and aspect, to throw off the almost inexorable chains of Great Britain. American representatives opposed additional taxes imposed on the colonies by the British Parliament.
It was never the intention of the soldiers or the British to bring any harm upon people at the Boston Massacre; it was simply an unfortunate and tragic result of unfavorable circumstances . He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burned our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
The 13 colonies were therefore justified in starting a revolt against England. The Parliament basically subjected a law that was an addition to the Molasses Act and said that there was a tax on all sugar that was purchased.
Since there were already more than members in the British Parliament, it's not as if the colonial representation would have made that much of a difference. Being that the colonists benefited from the French and Indian war, colonial help in paying back the debt was expected.
Besides the unreasonable reasons that they have to pay this tariff, there are more things wrong with giving the act. He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation: He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
For example, unlike in Europe, there was no powerful Church; personal freedom as it pertained to religion was therefore taken for granted in the colonies. Well one opposing this statement might say that the law was to give Americans some of the bills for the French and Indian War, and that is not relevant because America was not nearly as rich at the time of this war and thus, since Great Britain and America were together at the time, should not have needed any help at all.
Also the Sons of Liberty destroyed British property, like the tea, when it was the colonists that demanded the tea, England was confused, and so were the colonists, why would the have destroyed something they wanted?
For imposing taxes on us without our consent: There is a multitude of incompatible ideas of natural law that have caused even those who are in basic agreement on natural law theory to have opposing notions on the particulars.
The 13 colonies were unjustified to wage war on England. The story told about this bloody event is that there was confusion among the British officers when the American colonists approached, and as a result, the British randomly fired on the crowd of colonists.
According to England however the colonists were not justified in waging war. Get Access America was or was not justified in breaking away from Great Britain? He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and whe…n so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
WhenParliament would not acknowledge the justice of the colonistsgrievances, and it became apparent that the king completelysupported the parliament, the colonists decided to declareindependence.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare, is undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
For one thing, Parliament saw itself as sovereign over the entire British Empire, and reasoned that what was good for the British Empire was good for all its parts.
A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people. Essay Sample America had every right, mind and aspect, to throw off the almost inexorable chains of Great Britain.
The Boston Massacre was the colonists fault so they had no right to declare war. In reality, they enjoyed a great deal more freedom than the English in Britain.
The Americans, not liking the idea of them making the decisions of their country, decided to protest the soldiers and protest the tariffs.
Regarding the 3rd point about expecting the colonies to help pay for war, I completely disagree with Pro -- they absolutely should have helped to pay.The American Colonists were justified in starting a war to gain their independence, breaking away from Britain. -- taxation without representation: Great Britain began adding taxes on certain goods, forcing the Colonies to pay back their debt.
The colonists were actually the first people to fight in the war and had just as many losses as the actual country of Britain. So whats with taxes. This boston massacre was also a problem.
The American colonists were justified in waging war and breaking away from Britain because of unjust laws, a King of tyranny, and both violating searches and officials.
These things outraged the colonists /5(9). Other's say the colonists were not justified,since they were still the colony of the mother country, and the point of a colony is to supply raw materials and profit to the mother country.
The colonist thought that they were justified in waging war and breaking away from Britain in many ways. Other's say the colonists were not justified,since they were still the colony of the mother country, and the point of a colony is to supply raw materials and profit to the mother country.
The colonist thought that they were justified in waging war and breaking away from Britain in many ways. Mar 23, · The colonists were fully justified to declare war because it has already started and the British were not getting weaker, so they should attack now.
Lastly, in an excerpt from “The Declaration of Independence” that says, “The history of the present king of Great Britain is a Reviews:Download